State-backed ballot measure could wipe out a quarter of local property tax collections
Florida in Five: Five stories to read from the past week in Florida politics.

This is Seeking Rents, a newsletter and podcast devoted to producing original journalism — and lifting up the work of others — about Florida politics, with an emphasis on the ways that big businesses and other special interests influence public policy in the state. Seeking Rents is produced by veteran investigative journalist Jason Garcia, and it is free to all. But please consider a voluntary paid subscription, if you can afford one, to help support our work. And check out our video channel, too.
Welcome to another installment of Florida in Five: Five* stories you need to read from the past week in Florida politics.
Cities, counties and towns across Florida could lose close to a quarter of their annual property tax collections, if voters approve a state-backed ballot measure this fall that would cut and cap local property taxes.
That’s according to a new analysis by the state’s Revenue Estimating Conference — also known as the REC — a panel of nonpartisan economists tasked with forecasting the financial impacts of proposed legislation.
It’s the first full analysis of the seismic property tax plan that Gov. Ron DeSantis and Florida’s Republican-controlled Legislature rushed to pass during a 28-hour special session earlier this month.
The proposed constitutional amendment — which will only take effect if at least 60 percent of Florida voters support it in a statewide referendum in November — was conceived so quickly and with so little input from anyone outside the inner circles of Tallahassee leadership that even legislators who voted for the plan gave contradictory explanations of how it would actually work.

The REC analysis — which, to be very clear, should have been done before state lawmakers voted on this — found that the proposal would quickly lop off more than $8 billion a year in funding for local governments by supersizing a tax break for primary homeowners.
That provision, which would be phased in over two years, would generally increase the state’s homestead tax exemption from $50,000 to $250,000 — meaning, for example, that the owner of a $750,000 home would pay taxes to their local city or county government as if their home were worth only $500,000.
But the local revenue losses would widen rapidly from there — thanks largely to a second tax break that would suppress the annual tax bills for all other property owners, too.
That piece of the package would further restrict the year-to-year growth in tax assessments on all non-homestead property — everything from a New York couple’s vacation condo in Miami Beach to the Walt Disney Co.’s Magic Kingdom theme park.
Florida already caps increases to the annual tax assessments on non-homestead property at no more than 10 percent a year, the result of Big Business-backed constitutional amendments that passed in 2008 and 2018.
This new proposal would lower that ceiling even further so that the assessed value of non-homestead property could climb by no more than 5 percent a year — no matter how much the actual market value of the property rises.
In fact, one of the most striking findings from the REC’s analysis is just how quickly that tighter tax cap would compound, as the gap between what a piece of non-homestead property is worth and what it is taxed at steadily widens.
Local government revenue losses just from the non-homestead tax cap would swell more than six-fold over the first five years it is in effect — from around $350 million to more than $2.2 billion. And the tax differentials would keep on stacking up over time.

Altogether, the REC estimates that the combined package — the $250,000 homestead exemption plus the 5 percent annual non-homestead assessment cap — would wipe out nearly $12 billion in annual funding for local governments by the 2031-32 fiscal year.
And that does not include other not-yet-calculable impacts from the proposed constitutional amendment, which would, among other things, make it possible to continue increasing the homestead exemption — all the way up to 100 percent — without another statewide referendum.
For perspective: $12 billion would be somewhere in the ballpark of 24 percent of total local government property tax collections, based on the REC’s property tax growth forecasts and a bit of back-of-the-napkin math by Seeking Rents.
That’s an almost-unfathomable hit to local governments that pay for police, fire, parks, roads, sidewalks, stormwater drains, sewage plants, libraries, animal shelters, trash collection, summer camps and so much more.
Cities, counties and towns would have to make that money up somehow — through some inevitable combination of cutting public services, raising property tax rates, and charging new taxes and fees.
To understand how painful that process would be: Recall that the Florida House of Representatives last year proposed cutting the statewide sales tax from 6 percent to 5.25 percent. That three-quarters-of-a-point cut to sales tax would have reduced the state’s general revenue — the flexible pot of money that legislators are free to spend however they want — by about 10 percent.
And the Florida Legislature absolutely fell apart over it.
What was supposed to be a 60-day session dragged for more than 100 days as House and Senate leaders in Tallahassee proved utterly incapable of completing a state budget with that big a hole in the middle of it. They clashed over what existing programs to slash and which new projects to leave unfunded — and ultimately abandoned the sales tax cut entirely. The Florida Capitol has been basically dysfunctional for two years now, in large part because of the animosity that developed during that budget fight.
In other words, Republican legislators in Tallahassee could not handle even a 10 percent cut to their general revenue.
But, of course, they have no problems tossing an even bigger budget grenade into the laps of local governments.
*To paraphrase Barbossa, five is more what you’d call a guideline than an actual rule.
Austerity is coming
Florida property tax relief proposal could cost Palm Beach County $400M in services (WLRN)
See also: Florida tax plan would cost cities 25% or more, county estimate says (The Palm Beach Post) ($)
See also: Seminole commissioners warn of severe cuts in services if tax referendum approved (Orlando Sentinel) ($)
See also: Boca Raton could lose millions if property taxes are cut, impacting city services, officials say (South Florida Sun-Sentinel) ($)
See also: Fort Myers stares down revenue loss, advances police, fire projects (Fort Myers News-Press) ($)
Bipartisan sleaze at New College of Florida
St. Petersburg Sen. Rouson taking job at New College of Florida (Tampa Bay Times) ($)
See also: New College of Florida: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (HBO | YouTube)
Cheating to win elections, from Congress to classrooms
‘Total victory’: Florida’s top court allows use of DeSantis’ new congressional maps (Florida Trib)
See also: DeSantis wants teachers’ unions gone. United Teachers of Dade says it is here to stay (WLRN)
Legislators cut a study on the impacts of privatization from the new state budget
Florida taxpayers pay billions to Centurion, the prison health care provider and lawsuit magnet (Florida Bulldog)
See also: Legislature sweeps Florida Forever funding to rural conservation program (Orlando Sentinel) ($)
Dark clouds over the Sunshine State
More Floridians are turning to ‘Buy Now, Pay Later’ plans to cover grocery costs (WUSF)
See also: Florida immigration arrests have quietly surged, with state and local agencies at the forefront (WLRN)
Perspectives
Florida Makes a Property Tax Mistake (Wall Street Journal) ($)
Déjà vu: another misleading property tax ballot question (South Florida Sun Sentinel) ($)
The state strips power from local governments. You can change that (Tampa Bay Times) ($)
Feds order a Florida power plant to keep burning dirty coal (Florida Phoenix)
10 years after Pulse, Orlando won’t let anyone erase this tragedy (Orlando Sentinel) ($)





I reposted the address of Jason's recent account of the Petland lobbying saga in the Legislature this session on a local Neighborhood site in east Duval County where there is already underway an online informational campaign against Petland's dog-selling practices. The Neighborhood site emailed me three days later to say 1here were 133 views of my post, and then the following day a UNF sociologist also re-posted Jason's Petland article site address on the Neighborhood site.
I'm a broke-ass senior, Jason, but I do appreciate all your fine work!
As for the tax proposal on the ballot: There will be some winners, but the entire process took place in the opaque environment of a special session and, given the MAGA propensity to concentrate power in the hands of the rich and already powerful, I can't imagine voting for it.
The amendment sounds like a huge win for homeowners especially seniors who live here. The state would make a pretty smart move helping seniors who have paid off their homes by increasing their homestead exemption gradually year over year until fully eliminated.
The state clearly did not do their homework and it's a huge failure on our representatives to have voted in favor of this before the REC analysis was done or really any meaning full studies done to show what kind of impact this would have. This is a push from Desantis to go out with a "bang" and say he eliminated a huge tax for Floridians but he won't have to deal with the repercussions of this IF it passes.
People believe that local governments have mishandled their taxes however I disagree. I'm sure there are some local governments who have not done the best job with record keeping but overall especially here in Pinellas, I think my local governments have used our tax dollars well. Trees are trimmed prior to hurricane season, local parks are kept up very well especially Largo park with the beautiful Christmas decorations which are free for hundreds if not thousands of residents. And going to many of our amazing parks cost $0.00. There is no entrance fee, no parking fee, nothing.
Our beaches are well maintained along with our roads and parking for the beaches isn't crazy. Can and should the homestead exemption be increased? Yes but not as much and as quickly as the state has proposed.
Eliminating this tax wouldn't save me very much money if at all if I'm now forced to pay a higher vehicle registration fee, a park entrance fee, a parking fee at the park, a higher parking fee at the beach, trees not being trimmed before hurricane seasons, our roads not being maintained, local services being cut so not as many paramedics or police to respond to emergencies.
I'm voting no on this amendment and I hope others do as well. This was poorly thought out and will be detrimental to local governments and services people don't even realize what their tax dollars are paying for.